The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.

Many spurn new breast cancer study

Local cancer survivors, and experts reject the proposal of delaying mammograms.

Boy, 14, youngest in county to be tried as an adult
3/19/10
Grant applications for history-related projects now being accepted
3/19/10
Miami sets Tibetan Culture Week
3/19/10
Expert to talk about faith, climate
3/19/10
No raises in 1st year of contract for non-sworn police employees
3/19/10
> More headlines

By Josh Sweigart, Staff Writer 11:39 PM Tuesday, November 17, 2009

If she had not done a self-exam, if she had not gone in for annual screenings, Seven Mile resident Robin Middleton fears she would not have found her breast cancer until it was too late.

That’s why she, local health care providers and the American Cancer Society, are speaking out strongly against a recommendation from a government task force released Monday, Nov. 16.

That recommendation was that most women don’t need routine mammograms until age 50, and then only every two years, and that breast self-exams are unnecessary.

Middleton, 46, found a lump in her breast during a self exam in August 2008. She had no family history of cancer, didn’t smoke or have other risk factors. Chemotherapy, radiation treatment and a lumpectomy later, she had a mammography just last week and was “clear and clean.”

She called the government panel’s recommendation “ridiculous.”

“It’s going to narrow your odds of surviving,” she said.

Officials at The Fort Hamilton Hospital and Atrium Medical Center both say they will continue recommending annual exams starting at age 40 and strongly encourage self exams.

Dr. Hugh Hawkins, director of breast imaging at Atrium in Middletown, agrees that following the task force recommendations would reduce the cost of screenings.

“Unfortunately, it means a lot of women are going to have breast cancer at stages that are worse than what they have now,” he said. “They’re going to be a lot harder to treat if they come in with more disseminated disease ... and that’s going to be expensive.”

Hawkins worries about the impact of the recommendation. He said it confuses the public because President Barack Obama’s own proposed health care reform touts the importance of screening to save money. And it comes on the heels of several years of reducing breast cancer deaths, atributed to increased screenings, Hawkins said.

The American Cancer Society is holding to its recommendations that women should be screened annually after age 40, and says they should speak to their doctors about whether self exams would be useful.

“The (task force) says that screening 1,339 women in their 50s to save one life makes screening worthwhile in that age group. Yet (it) also says screening 1,904 women ages 40 to 49 in order to save one life is not worthwhile,” said Dr. Otis Brawley, American Cancer Society chief medical officer.

“With its new recommendations, the (task force) is essentially telling women that mammography at age 40 to 49 saves lives; just not enough of them,” he said.

Contact this reporter at (513) 820-2175 or jsweigart@coxohio.com.

Share this article

ADD COMMENT

Comments feed

Those self exams and mammograms saved my wife. Two tumors at age 33. Just a sign of things to come if Obama gets his way and the government starts taking over healthcare. They would rather save money instead of lives. Let's get the idiot out power before it's too late

Mike
10:49 PM, 11/19/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Welcome to obama care, this is a calculated trial balloon to see how much opposition the White House gets telling you when you will get medical attention, instead of you knowing when you need it. This administration can't deliver H1N1 vaccines, and you want to give them control of all health care.

Todd
4:22 PM, 11/18/2009

REPORT ABUSE

That's why they biopsy the lesion to confirm it's cancer FIRST. The mammography is NOT the sole determinant of if you have radiation or chemo done. Get a grip, or, maybe a medical degree, before you make such statements. The other comment about the mammogram increasing your risk for cancer is reckless, too. The amount of radiation you are exposed to in your daily life from both natural and man-made sources far outstrips ANY mammogram's radiation.

Kajun
1:32 PM, 11/18/2009

REPORT ABUSE

More dangerous government socialistic take over with the government running a medical dept.
For those that voted for Obama, you ARE going to regret it, if you have not already!!!

DA
10:55 AM, 11/18/2009

REPORT ABUSE

For a decade the medical community has known that annual mammograms do not increase longevity. Yet American women adhere irrationally to a belief which has been disproven by a huge randomized (approx. 900,000 women in China) trial. Similarly self exams do not increase longevity. What predicts survival is the nature of the cancer. If the tumor is indolent you live, if the tumor (even tiny ones) is aggressive you may face a serious diagnosis.

Titanthebear
10:38 AM, 11/18/2009

REPORT ABUSE

There are 3 additional comments

SHOW ALL

We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.