Home > Blogs > Women's Life > Archives > 2009 > August > 12 > Entry
Did ‘Self’ photoshop the crap out of Kelly Clarkson?
Self magazine is coming under criticism for retouching a cover photo of singer Kelly Clarkson.
A few months ago, Jenny McCarthy, she of the rock hard abs, said her cover photo was retouched to make her look more muscular. But after Self ran the original and retouched photo side-by-side and they showed little difference McCarthy backed down.
Lucy Danziger, editor-in-chief of the women’s health magazine, said on the magazine’s website that the “retouching” of the 27-year-old Clarkson is to make her “look her personal best.”
Readers on the Jezebel.com website disagreed.
“Hey, hi, Self ladies: None this changes or explains the fact that YOU ALTERED THE BONE STRUCTURE OF HER FACE,” wrote one.
Interestingly, in the article, Clarkson is above it all: “When people talk about my weight, I’m like, ‘You seem to have a problem with it; I don’t. I’m fine!,’
Permalink | Comments (5) | Post your comment | Categories: body image

Comments
By Tom
August 12, 2009 10:52 AM | Link to this
Who cares! Why waste web space with this?
By LJ
August 12, 2009 11:46 AM | Link to this
Tom cares or else he wouldn’t have left a blog and wasted MORE web space!
By Tim
August 12, 2009 12:01 PM | Link to this
Kelly Clarkson is a beautiful woman with or without the touch up.
By Anon
August 12, 2009 2:31 PM | Link to this
All magazines do retouching. Nothing new… Move on, move on…nothing to see here.
By Kim
August 12, 2009 4:15 PM | Link to this
tom: because web space is endless so i can give a little bit of everything to you readers : )