By triarmatype

June 26, 2011 4:50 PM | Link to this

j4j3h4kj5 [url=http://k4jkd8gh4.com]link[/url]

By Bahkerfah

June 19, 2011 12:29 AM | Link to this

This is my first message. Please don’t delete it. Thanks jsh39shd2 [url=http://hsk39sg3.com]link[/url]

By Hot Babes

February 9, 2011 4:34 PM | Link to this

If you are part of the solution, you are part of the problem.

By Hot men

February 9, 2011 2:49 PM | Link to this

You can never step into the same river twice.

By Erotikkontakte aus Niedersachsen

February 6, 2011 11:28 PM | Link to this

Winning isn’t everything, it is the only thing. (Nothing matters but winning).

By Erotikkontakte aus Westphalia

February 6, 2011 11:28 PM | Link to this

Anything is possible.

By onlinehealthmedicine

January 30, 2011 10:53 AM | Link to this

What a great web log. I spend hours on the net reading blogs, about tons of various subjects. I have to first of all give praise to whoever created your theme and second of all to you for writing what i can only describe as an fabulous article. I honestly believe there is a skill to writing articles that only very few posses and honestly you got it. The combining of demonstrative and upper-class content is by all odds super rare with the astronomic amount of blogs on the cyberspace.

By Lasix Sin Receta

January 27, 2011 7:31 PM | Link to this

A swarm in May is worth a load of hay; a swarm in June is worth a silver spoon; but a swarm in July is not worth a fly

By mefty

December 25, 2009 3:53 AM | Link to this

I want to quote your post in my blog. It can? And you et an account on Twitter?

By Porfel

November 29, 2009 6:25 PM | Link to this

Dear Author www.daytondailynews.com ! Quite right! Idea excellent, it agree with you.

By Consider the facts

November 24, 2009 9:12 PM | Link to this

Mr Not A Sheeple, Moyer is a Republican. Illegal aliens can’t vote and nobody is trying to change that.

By We the People

November 23, 2009 10:28 PM | Link to this

In addition they must think that the people that vote are to ignorant to vote for the person OF THIER CHOICE! They think they know more than us. Stand up Ohioians against this kind of BS that is stripping you of your consitutional rights, that my and your forefathers fought and died for to attain and keep! NEVER let somebody take away your right to vote no matter whether you are a Democrat or Republican or some other politcal belief.

By We The People

November 23, 2009 10:21 PM | Link to this

WHy do they have a commitee to say we need to change the way all political postions are attained and let someone that already won by raising the most campaign funds appoint their friends and people that will owe them a return favor. WHAT THE HECK IS THE DIFFERENCE, NOT ONE BIT OF DIFERENCE EXCEPT WE LOSE MORE RIGHTS AS VOTERS AND CITIZENS!!!

By Mark

November 22, 2009 2:40 PM | Link to this

baabaaaaaa, I said “seems” because right now there is no firm plan that has been announced. I like the idea, but until there are details, I can’t cite any facts. All I was saying was I like it in theory. You don’t have to like my opinion, but please do not call me uneducated. I recommend watching the Frontline special “Justice for Sale,” although it probably won’t change your opinion, it does give plenty of food for thought on both sides of the issue. I don’t really like the idea of electing justices—but I’m not advocating political appointments for life either. A more merit based system would be the best option. It has been proven in other states that it imporves judicial integrity and independence from campaign money in judicial races. Simple as that.

By not a sheeple

November 22, 2009 6:21 AM | Link to this

Moyer says there’s a “perception” of contributions/influence peddling? NO YOUR HONOR {SNICKER}…..there is the “perception” that you want to cement your party’s power status in perpetuity. Isn’t Jennifer Brunner (your fellow Democratic political crony) also trying to make it easier for illegal aliens to register to vote? Your greed and avarice is clearly obvious.

By baabaaaaaa

November 22, 2009 6:15 AM | Link to this

Mark: you used the word “seem” or “seems” but you cited no FACTS. Your uneducated guess bears no weight when we are talking about corruption, nepotism and political cronyism in appointments. Your comment is a perfect example of why we need elected judges - otherwise, ignorant sheeple like yourself would simply follow the herd blindly bleeting as the power elites expect you (and the rest of us) to do.

By Ret. Law Enforcement

November 21, 2009 4:00 PM | Link to this

This is another attempt by the “elitist”, Moyer is president, who believe the “PEOPLE” are too stupid to pick their jurist. I say this, we will not stand still for you Justice Moyer or any other political hack manipulating an effort to take away our voice in the “THIRD” leg, the Judiciary, in our form of government. How dare you. We don’t need Johnny or Jane who couldn’t make it in private practice sit in the magistrate office etc…, work their way up through the bueacratic stairway of favoritism so they can be at the front for APPOINTMENT to supreme court judge.

By Leslie

November 21, 2009 10:16 AM | Link to this

I prefer the existing system to appointments. We the people need to quit giving up our voices. We do not want politicians picking our judges.

By B

November 20, 2009 8:48 PM | Link to this

wow, appointed judges, it works so well for Federal judgeships….unless the people appointing them are somehow non-political, it won’t be any better than it is now.

By Mark

November 20, 2009 6:28 PM | Link to this

We need fair, judicious justices on the bench…not just good fundraisers. The proposed system seems to have the potential to be an improvement. Many other states already use the proposed system or something similar and it seems to work for them.

By jj nelson

November 20, 2009 5:57 PM | Link to this

You can count on whatever party isn’t in control to propose a new method. Seems like it’s working fine to me!!